You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We want to use your jquery form plugin in a commercial product we distribute, but the license is not clear enough.
In your README and javascript code, the license is described as "Dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses".
I think that "or" clause is more suitable than "and" clause in this case. This "and" context might be recognized as that it applies both of two licenses.
In jquery v1.5, the license is "Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL Version 2 licenses". This sentence uses "or" instead of "and." I think that it's better to follow up this version license.
My company is a little more careful with GPL licensed projects and our legal team wants some clarification on what this dual licenses means.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We want to use your jquery form plugin in a commercial product we distribute, but the license is not clear enough.
In your README and javascript code, the license is described as "Dual licensed under the MIT and GPL licenses".
I think that "or" clause is more suitable than "and" clause in this case. This "and" context might be recognized as that it applies both of two licenses.
In jquery v1.5, the license is "Dual licensed under the MIT or GPL Version 2 licenses". This sentence uses "or" instead of "and." I think that it's better to follow up this version license.
My company is a little more careful with GPL licensed projects and our legal team wants some clarification on what this dual licenses means.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: