Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Balance negative penalties to strategies #35

Open
jrossignol opened this issue Apr 5, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Balance negative penalties to strategies #35

jrossignol opened this issue Apr 5, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@jrossignol
Copy link
Owner

Add some downsides to some strategies. Suggestions from ibanix:

Some of the strategies are a lot more generous than others:

"To Boldly Go" has no downsides except for the startup costs, which are really not bad at all. It could use some sort of drawback, such as -X% less funds from non-science contracts, or -X% reputation to contracts in a celestial/biome you've already visited. You're trying to Boldly Go somewhere new, right?

The same problem exists for "Local Science", because you can get a stupidly huge amount of science just from KSC/Kerbin alone, with no downsides. I'd suggest something like a large -X% funds modifier to all contract rewards while in effect. Another idea would be that a certain amount of science has to be collected from Kerbin to satisfy Local Science; if you drop the strategy before reaching this goal, you forefit lots of funds/reputation/science. 

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant