-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is this project active ? #124
Comments
@amiracam I recently got openjfx 8 installed on fedora core and the samples worked. I will say stable is in the eye of the beholder. We definitely should work on this more but many things just work now too. |
thanks, I’ve not yet moved over to the “openjdk” side of things although it seems I should
…--
Charles Monteiro
On Sep 21, 2018, 2:58 PM -0400, Thomas E Enebo ***@***.***>, wrote:
@amiracam I recently got openjfx 8 installed on fedora core and the samples worked. I will say stable is in the eye of the beholder. We definitely should work on this more but many things just work now too.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
JRubyFX 2.0 has been released. Your issue may have been fixed in 2.0. If your issue still applies to JRubyFX 2.0, please reopen this issue. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
does not seem to be much activity but perhaps because its stable ? is that the case ?
Is there a sense for how incompatible it may be with JavaFX 8 ?
thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: