You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I request that the dyad ". (numbers) be given an inverse. I propose the inverse be ": (as it is for monadic ".). A minor improvement would be to to use a hypen rather than an underbar for the negative sign.
I can't think of a way to make the x in x&". useful to the inverse. One idea is to make x&".^:_1 ↔ x&":, but the problem with that approach is that for most applications, x=0, yet 0&": is not a useful format (again, for most applications).
In any case, I see no reason why +:&(0&".) should fail (and its obvious substitute, +:&.". has wrong (and dangerous) semantics.
-- Dan Bron <2008-02-01T23:27:07Z>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I request that the dyad ". (numbers) be given an inverse. I propose the inverse be ": (as it is for monadic ".). A minor improvement would be to to use a hypen rather than an underbar for the negative sign.
I can't think of a way to make the x in
x&".
useful to the inverse. One idea is to makex&".^:_1
↔x&":
, but the problem with that approach is that for most applications,x=0
, yet0&":
is not a useful format (again, for most applications).In any case, I see no reason why
+:&(0&".)
should fail (and its obvious substitute,+:&.".
has wrong (and dangerous) semantics.-- Dan Bron <2008-02-01T23:27:07Z>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: