Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Start tracking encryption and JWK support #94

Closed
dvsekhvalnov opened this issue Aug 21, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Start tracking encryption and JWK support #94

dvsekhvalnov opened this issue Aug 21, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@dvsekhvalnov
Copy link

Hi guys,

just as an idea may be it's time to start tracking not only signing, but also encryption and JWK support?

Many libraries looks absolutely same in your list (e.g. almost all support full suite for signing). But if you dig to extended capabilities it will make difference.

Probably it even make sense to split support to: JWT (iss, nbf and other semantic claims), JOSE (sig and encryption) and JWK.

@bencmbrook
Copy link

This would be a great way of pushing adoption for JWK. The PKI is still really lacking for JWT - even the Auth0 module requires public keys be read as .pem files.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 17, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you have not received a response for our team (apologies for the delay) and this is still a blocker, please reply with additional information or just a ping. Thank you for your contribution! 🙇‍♂️

@stale stale bot added the closed:stale label Nov 17, 2020
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants