Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expand on motivation / justification for jsxstyle #68

Closed
charlie-axsy opened this issue Aug 5, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Expand on motivation / justification for jsxstyle #68

charlie-axsy opened this issue Aug 5, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@charlie-axsy
Copy link

Regarding the section in the FAQ which states that:

jsxstyle is predicated on the idea that stylesheet rules are not a great way to reuse styles and that components are the correct abstraction.

Since believing in this opinion is vital to developers deciding whether to use this library, please can you expand the readme with more evidence on why you believe that components are the right abstraction.

@meyer
Copy link
Collaborator

meyer commented Aug 6, 2017

@charlie-axsy very good point. The README is horrendously out of date, but I’m working on a rewrite at the moment. I’ll be sure to explain this more clearly.

@meyer meyer added this to In progress in Roadmap Aug 6, 2017
@meyer meyer added this to the jsxstyle 2.0 milestone Aug 14, 2017
@meyer
Copy link
Collaborator

meyer commented Sep 15, 2017

@charlie-axsy I’m working on the README at the moment. Is there anything in particular about the component model that doesn’t make sense to you? What are you comparing it to?

@meyer
Copy link
Collaborator

meyer commented Oct 2, 2017

@charlie-axsy README has been completely rewritten. Feel free to reopen this issue if there’s something it doesn’t cover that you think it should.

https://github.com/smyte/jsxstyle/blob/21e5127/packages/jsxstyle/README.md

@meyer meyer closed this as completed Oct 2, 2017
@meyer meyer moved this from In progress to Done in Roadmap Oct 2, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants