Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Separate engine and content #24

Open
jtojnar opened this issue Apr 20, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

Separate engine and content #24

jtojnar opened this issue Apr 20, 2014 · 5 comments
Labels
idea
Milestone
0.0.8

Comments

@jtojnar
Copy link
Owner

jtojnar commented Apr 20, 2014

Pengu should only be game server, content should be in separate repo.
@jtojnar jtojnar added the idea label Apr 20, 2014
@jtojnar jtojnar mentioned this issue Apr 20, 2014
Closed
@jtojnar jtojnar modified the milestones: little further in future, something like the one after the next version Apr 20, 2014
@mv100 mv100 mentioned this issue Apr 21, 2014
Closed
@jtojnar
Copy link
Owner Author

jtojnar commented Apr 21, 2014

Maybe the content should be called pengu and we should come up with another name for the server engine. Client should be probably completely separated from server too. Should be content part of the client? Or independent part used by both server and client?

@mv100
Copy link

mv100 commented Apr 21, 2014

I've been thinking about this, too. I'm not quite sure about the goal of the project. Is it something like we want to create a chat system that anyone could customize? If it is, I think we should make a name for core (server+client, I wouldn't separate it) and call the FCP version with penguins "Pengu".

@jtojnar
Copy link
Owner Author

jtojnar commented Apr 24, 2014

OK, created repo for new engine. I should probably start preparing for my maturita exam but nevermind.

@mv100 mv100 mentioned this issue Apr 25, 2014
Open
@mv100
Copy link

mv100 commented Apr 25, 2014

Weirwood... I should start watching GoT.
Good luck with maturita!

@jtojnar
Copy link
Owner Author

jtojnar commented Apr 28, 2014

Maybe this design could be used: https://github.com/mozilla/BrowserQuest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
idea
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.0.8
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jtojnar @mv100