Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOC]: Standardize Sphinx section and header format #234

Merged
merged 37 commits into from Sep 5, 2023

Conversation

synchon
Copy link
Collaborator

@synchon synchon commented Aug 4, 2023

This PR standardizes section and header ordering format for Sphinx docs.

@synchon synchon added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 4, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #234 (db070ad) into main (00e8c27) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #234   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines            1         1           
=========================================
  Hits             1         1           
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2023

PR Preview Action v1.4.4
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2023-09-05 12:22 UTC

@synchon synchon requested a review from fraimondo August 4, 2023 10:54
@synchon synchon merged commit 74b8600 into main Sep 5, 2023
16 checks passed
@synchon synchon deleted the docs/consistent-sphinx-structure branch September 5, 2023 12:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants