Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

License and general questions #9

Closed
seekingdeep opened this issue Aug 20, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

License and general questions #9

seekingdeep opened this issue Aug 20, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@seekingdeep
Copy link

seekingdeep commented Aug 20, 2021

embedseg seems promising,

  • why not use bsd or apache for license
  • how does embedseg compares to DenoiSeg in segmenting connected components, performance, efficiency, etc...
@lmanan
Copy link
Contributor

lmanan commented Aug 23, 2021

Hi @seekingdeep
Thanks for looking into EmbedSeg.

Regarding the second question about comparisons with DenoiSeg, since there the model is trained for a semantic task (i.e. trained to predict the pixel class) and addresses instance segmentation by extracting connected components during post processing, this would generally under-perform methods on instance segmentation metrics (such as AP and SEG) where the model is trained directly for instance segmentation.

For example: AP scores for IoU threshold = 0.5 for alpha best configuration using all images (3800) as quoted by DenoiSeg is 0.801±0.001 (in comparison, instance segmentation methods generally perform at ~0.86 on the same dataset!)

The benefits of DenoiSeg and other methods addressing semantic segmentation on the other hand is a simplified architecture, more intuitive methodology and more robust training. Also, DenoiSeg should perform equally well as instance segmentation approaches on semantic segmentation metrics (since this is what the model is trained for) such as computing Jaccard Index between the predicted foreground and the ground truth foreground.

Regarding the first question, we re-used and adapted code by Neven et al, 2019 and so wanted to use the same license file as used by them!

@seekingdeep
Copy link
Author

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants