Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature request] Option to disable linter #112

Closed
Allardvm opened this issue Dec 1, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

[Feature request] Option to disable linter #112

Allardvm opened this issue Dec 1, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@Allardvm
Copy link

Allardvm commented Dec 1, 2016

As you might be aware, the Julia linter still has an issue with relative module paths. I love the functionality that the linter provides, but due to this issue it's giving me so many false-positives that I'd like to have a way to disable it. Would it be possible to add a configuration option for this? I gave it a shot myself, but there are so many ways that this can be done (considering how you're interfacing with Julia from VS Code) that it's probably best if you tackle this yourself—most notably because you'll be able to consider how future functionality might hook into the same configuration system.

Thanks for the great package!

@ZacLN
Copy link
Contributor

ZacLN commented Dec 1, 2016

Ah yes this is a bit of a pain. I'll see if I can add a configuration option

@Allardvm
Copy link
Author

Allardvm commented Dec 3, 2016

Thanks for adding!

@Allardvm Allardvm closed this as completed Dec 3, 2016
@ZacLN
Copy link
Contributor

ZacLN commented Dec 3, 2016

No problem!

@affans
Copy link

affans commented Jun 4, 2017

Has this been implemented? I too am having a lot of problems with the linter.

@davidanthoff
Copy link
Member

The whole linter story will be much better in the next version of the extension, which is currently in alpha. We have some alpha builds on the release section here on github if you want to try it. But be warned, it is julia 0.6 only and an alpha, so probably has some other issues. But any feedback would be most welcome!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants