You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm a bit unhappy that we need to do the complicated VisitationFrequency(RectangularBinning(n)). I understand that VisitationFrequency could take other things than RectangularBinning, but I don't understand where else RectangularBinning can be given to except VisitationFrequency. Why don't we allow RectangularBinning itself to be used directly with probabilities? @kahaaga
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
RectangularBinning is used both with VisitationFrequency and TransferOperator - that's why I didn't make RectangularBinning itself an estimator.
There will be two types of binnings: RectangularBinning and TriangularBinning (#55, which I have to finish after a loong hiatus). Both can be inputs to both VisitationFrequency and TransferOperator.
I do agree, however, that it would be convenient to just pass RectangularBinning directly to probabilities. We could just mention in the docstring that this is just a convenience call to VisitationFrequency.
On the same note, I think I'd like shorter names. What do you think about RectangularBinning → Grid and TriangulationBinning → Triangulation?
I'm a bit unhappy that we need to do the complicated
VisitationFrequency(RectangularBinning(n))
. I understand thatVisitationFrequency
could take other things thanRectangularBinning
, but I don't understand where elseRectangularBinning
can be given to exceptVisitationFrequency
. Why don't we allowRectangularBinning
itself to be used directly withprobabilities
? @kahaagaThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: