Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Volume-Edge Ratio Quality Measures #18

Closed
sjkelly opened this issue Feb 9, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #19
Closed

Volume-Edge Ratio Quality Measures #18

sjkelly opened this issue Feb 9, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #19

Comments

@sjkelly
Copy link
Member

sjkelly commented Feb 9, 2020

See: https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~jrs/stellar/KlingnerPhD.pdf

The current quality implementation relies on tetrahedra -> triangle decomposition. In the 2D case this is fine, but in the 3D case we need to create a unique set of primitives just for this quality measure. Volume-Edge ratio might be simpler. There might also be a way to use the preexisting edge length calculations.

@sjkelly
Copy link
Member Author

sjkelly commented Feb 11, 2020

Prospectively, with this measure not only out-of-boundary tets can be filtered, but also low quality ones as well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant