Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support asciimath in Markdown fields #1918

Open
Phyks opened this issue Nov 23, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Support asciimath in Markdown fields #1918

Phyks opened this issue Nov 23, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@Phyks
Copy link

Phyks commented Nov 23, 2016

Hi,

AsciiMath is a really convenient way to write maths inline à la Markdown.

MathJax supports it out of the box (see the "Getting started" section in the above link).

As Jupyter notebooks already make use MathJax, I guess it should not be really difficult to add support for AsciiMath in cells.

What do you think about it? This would ease writing small mathematical code, and not require to insert LaTeX in the cells.

The only issue I can think of is that the default configuration uses backticks (`) to delimit AsciiMath code, and this is already used in Markdown for inline code. So, the user should either escape them with a leading backslash (not really practical), or we should think about an alternative delimiter.

Thanks!

@takluyver
Copy link
Member

I like the idea, but I don't want to make more ad-hoc extensions to Markdown syntax. We're hoping that CommonMark will come up with a proper extension syntax.

@opensource21
Copy link

Now we are over 3 years later. I fear waiting on CommonMark isn't a good option. AsciiMath and Jupiter Notebooks seems a good option a schools where Latex is a hard challenge. Specially for people who are visually handicapped this is a good solution. Would great to see it or perhaps in a specific branch?

@mr0re1
Copy link

mr0re1 commented Sep 1, 2023

3 years have passed again. Just checking in.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants