-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V2.0 Feature: Permissions #7
Comments
I would suggest Option 2. Because it's easyer for discord server admins to setup. But probally harder for the coders. |
Closed
I vote for option 2, discord already has a permissions system, so why not take advantage of it. (its also easier for the server admins like @Cyberstar1 said) |
Closed
srhinos
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 1, 2016
srhinos
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 1, 2016
… it so it doesn't require perms and added in the suggested ignore features.
Old issue, we already have a permission system. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently any user can use any command, and this is obviously sub optimal for any setting other than a group of friends. Denying users access to certain commands is obviously necessary for more public settings. This issue is twofold: the implementation of the internal permissions system, and how the user access it. Other variations are still a possibility.
!permit user
style of command.DJ
, and only users with the groupDJ
would be able to use those commands.s
v
botperms-
botperms-s
would have access to the skip commandbotperms-v
would have access to the volume commandbotperms-sv
would have access to both commandsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: