Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How can i make it vertical (top to bottom) rather than horizontal? #16

Closed
m-adil opened this issue Aug 14, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

How can i make it vertical (top to bottom) rather than horizontal? #16

m-adil opened this issue Aug 14, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@m-adil
Copy link

m-adil commented Aug 14, 2017

How can i alter to make it vertical i.e. top to bottom rather than horizontal chart? I'm starting from one ancestor and have all children below.

I'm using this example i.e. Ancestors & Defendants.

@justincy
Copy link
Owner

My response in this issue explains how to do it: #10

@m-adil
Copy link
Author

m-adil commented Aug 14, 2017

thanks for quick response @justincy

@m-adil
Copy link
Author

m-adil commented Sep 4, 2017

@justincy can you or someone please provide an example/link for top to bottom pedigree? I actually got the time today to work on that module again but it doesn't seem so simple as its stated in your comment and the third note in the readme. I tried converting this example to vertical pedigree following your guide and finally I got top to bottom structure as per my requirements but still the links between the nodes aren't perfect.

I think it will be good if we can add a new issue to create a top-bottom example when possible.

@justincy
Copy link
Owner

justincy commented Sep 4, 2017

Good idea. #17

@m-adil
Copy link
Author

m-adil commented Sep 4, 2017

Thanks, I really appreciate.

@encrayan
Copy link

Any news on this

@justincy
Copy link
Owner

Nope. I haven't done it yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants