-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make a BrowserFS GitHub organisation and migrate the repos to it #46
Comments
I talked with @lavelle about this. We're going to postpone any sort of radical reorg until we adequately figure out how it will impact:
I've created a wiki page here that we will formulate our plans on: https://github.com/jvilk/BrowserFS/wiki/Modular-Reorganization Discussion can take place in this issue. |
Note that this is not a focus of development at this time. We should take our time in figuring this out. Other bugs come first. In the meantime, we'll continue adding backends (such as cloud storage) to BFS. |
Someone has claimed the browserfs GitHub organization. I don't know who, as nothing about it is public. 😦 |
The owners of the browserfs GitHub organization are using it privately and do not wish to rename, so I'll have to find a new name to use. |
Due to lack of interest from others, I am closing this issue. I do not believe a whole organization with many tiny modules is worth the effort, given that I am the only maintainer. I would rather support making it easier to build customized builds. |
I think we've agreed on keeping things modular and having separate repos for each backend (or each one not currently this repo, at least). To make it easier for users to find all the backends, it would be good to put them all under one account.
This account would have:
Currently
[Core + Test suite] <- [Backends]
Proposed
[Test suite] <- [Backends] <- [Core]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: