We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
作者你好, 我发现在你的两篇文章里(MVSDF和Vis-MVSNet),对于Vis-MVSNet在DTU上的evlauation的结果的差距比较大,如下图所示,一个是0.88,一个是0.365。如果我没有理解错的话,Chamfer(L1) 就是Acc. Comp.的平均数,也就是overall。如果两个指标应该是同一个意思,为什么在两篇论文里会差距这么大呢?请多多指教,谢谢!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
有这么几点不同
Sorry, something went wrong.
明白了,非常感谢!
No branches or pull requests
作者你好,
我发现在你的两篇文章里(MVSDF和Vis-MVSNet),对于Vis-MVSNet在DTU上的evlauation的结果的差距比较大,如下图所示,一个是0.88,一个是0.365。如果我没有理解错的话,Chamfer(L1) 就是Acc. Comp.的平均数,也就是overall。如果两个指标应该是同一个意思,为什么在两篇论文里会差距这么大呢?请多多指教,谢谢!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: