Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request: Allow bypassing 'create folder?' request at startup if cache folders are missing #44

Closed
cr08 opened this issue Mar 1, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
type:Enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@cr08
Copy link

cr08 commented Mar 1, 2019

As requested in #39

With the new update to allow creation of the cache folders if missing (if using custom paths) it now adds a user input request to confirm creation upon startup.

The issue is that at the end of the script regardless of whether it is using the default temp folders or custom paths for the cache folders, it will erase the folders outright. So even for custom paths if you originally created the folders, the script will wipe them when one instance of the script finishes and on the next will query the user to create them again. This breaks batch scripts.

Either providing a command line or config option to bypass this query and default it to yes or rewriting the cache erasing section of the script to retain the custom folders would work. Not preferential to either one. Whatever works to get around this. :)

@k4yt3x k4yt3x self-assigned this Mar 1, 2019
@k4yt3x k4yt3x added the type:Enhancement New feature or request label Mar 1, 2019
@k4yt3x
Copy link
Owner

k4yt3x commented Mar 11, 2019

Just to let you not wait in despair, I AM working on this. I just haven't decided weather to just fix this folder creating thing alone, or add a --batch option to automatically select all default values.

@k4yt3x
Copy link
Owner

k4yt3x commented Mar 12, 2019

You can now use the -b, --batch option, and it will skip all those questions.
Referenced commit: 03d3c16

@k4yt3x k4yt3x closed this as completed Mar 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:Enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants