Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

raster and terra are slower on better PC #4

Closed
kadyb opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

raster and terra are slower on better PC #4

kadyb opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@kadyb
Copy link
Owner

kadyb commented Feb 17, 2021

Benchmarks were run on two different hardware configurations. Almost all packages noted better times on the newer PC (test 2) except selected functions from raster and terra.

# test 1 hardware
CPU: Intel Core i5 3210M 2.50 GHz
RAM: 8 GB
OS: Windows 8.1

# test 2 hardware
CPU: Intel Xeon CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
RAM: 64 GB
OS: Pop!_OS 20.04 LTS

Timings are given as medians of 10 iterations.

task package test 1 test 2
extract-points raster 22.3 24.5
crop terra 6.3 8.3
extract-points terra 6.7 7.2
write terra 38.9 42.0
ndvi raster-fun 8.1 9.0
ndvi raster-overlay 5.7 6.5
ndvi terra-fun 8.8 11.6
ndvi terra-lapp 7.3 8.9

(I rerun below tests so the results are not accidental)

For reference:

  1. timings.csv - test 1 (15.02)
  2. timings.csv - test 2 (16.02)
@kadyb kadyb closed this as completed May 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant