New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
presence module with in-memory presentity records #2294
Comments
- work in progress to have in-memory only records, without database storage
A report and discussions were done at: |
segfault when
|
Can you get the output for following commands:
|
|
Apparently I broke initialization of some structures when I added conditions on db connectivity. I just pushed another set of commits in master. Can you try again? |
trying again on latest master branch. i'll post results. |
more coredumps. is it okay to email the bt to you as they may contain sensitive data at this point? |
Yes, send them to me. I am at the stage of testing with default config file that still uses database for subscriptions and watchers, but with presentity records kept in memory. Tests are ok so far with two devices watching each other the presence status. |
Closing based on a few days running without issues. From now on newly discovered bugs can get a dedicated issue on this tracker. |
Track the issues discovered by different developers while implementing in-memory only presentity records for presence module.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: