We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Seems that topos is not adding Record-Route headers in this scenario.
I've added some more debug to topos: https://paste.debian.net/1152674/ Full kamailio-lb.log
This is the part when processing of the 200 OK coming from PSTN(fake)
Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:868]: tps_response_received(): handling incoming response Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:376]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - x_via1: [SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5064;branch=z9hG4bKcf3d.49d855e2b5f83b9dff62c8a6b0cf23f8.0](80) - x_via2: [](0) - x_vbranch1: [z9hG4bKcf3d.49d855e2b5f83b9dff62c8a6b0cf23f8.0](46) Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:485]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - a_rr: [](0) - b_rr: [](0) - s_rr: [](0) Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:490]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - as_contact: [](0) - bs_contact: [](0) Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_storage.c:126]: tps_storage_lock_get(): tps lock get: 220 Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:889]: tps_response_received(): loaded dialog a_uuid [atpsh-5eeb547f-3970-3] Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_storage.c:391]: tps_storage_link_msg(): downstream: yes - acontact: [] - bcontact: [sip:127.0.2.1:50603;transport=UDP] Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_storage.c:138]: tps_storage_lock_release(): tps lock release: 220 Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:182]: tps_add_headers(): adding to headers(0) - [Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5080;received=127.0.0.1;branch=z9hG4bKh2oO8aY.;rport=5080#015#012] Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:910]: tps_response_received(): x_rr[] y_rr[] s_rr[<sip:127.0.0.1:5064;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=5A412B38-5EEB5492000D683F-C3258700;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:127.0.0.1:5064>,<sip:127.0.0.1;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=5A412B38-5EEB5492000D683F-C3258700;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:127.0.0.1:5064>] Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:182]: tps_add_headers(): adding to headers(0) - [Record-Route: <sip:127.0.0.1:5064;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=5A412B38-5EEB5492000D683F-C3258700;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:127.0.0.1:5064>,<sip:127.0.0.1;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=5A412B38-5EEB5492000D683F-C3258700;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:127.0.0.1:5064>#015#012] Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: topos [tps_msg.c:182]: tps_add_headers(): adding to headers(0) - [P-SR-XBranch: z9hG4bKcf3d.49d855e2b5f83b9dff62c8a6b0cf23f8.0#015#012] Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: NOTICE: REPLY_FROM_OUTBOUND <script>: Reply from Outbound - S=200 - OK M=INVITE IP=«udp»:«127.0.2.1»:«50603» ID=«NGCP%invite_peerout_outbound_socket%///1-15281@127.126.0.1_b2b-1» UA='<null>' DESTIP=«127.0.0.1»:«5064» Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: NOTICE: REPLY_FROM_OUTBOUND <script>: NATed reply detected - ID=«NGCP%invite_peerout_outbound_socket%///1-15281@127.126.0.1_b2b-1» UA='<null>' Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: NOTICE: REPLY_FROM_OUTBOUND <script>: Sending reply from outbound, fs='«udp:127.0.0.1:5060»' du='«127.0.0.1»:«5080»' - ID=«NGCP%invite_peerout_outbound_socket%///1-15281@127.126.0.1_b2b-1» UA='<null>' Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [topos_mod.c:514]: tps_execute_event_route(): executing event_route[topos:topos:msg-sending] (2) Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [tps_msg.c:1038]: tps_response_sent(): handling outgoing response Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [tps_msg.c:376]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - x_via1: [SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5080;received=127.0.0.1;branch=z9hG4bKh2oO8aY.;rport=5080](79) - x_via2: [](0) - x_vbranch1: [z9hG4bKh2oO8aY.](15) Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [tps_msg.c:485]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - a_rr: [](0) - b_rr: [<sip:127.0.0.1:5064;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=5A412B38-5EEB5492000D683F-C3258700;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:127.0.0.1:5064>,<sip:127.0.0.1;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=5A412B38-5EEB5492000D683F-C3258700;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:127.0.0.1:5064>](214) - s_rr: [](0) Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [tps_msg.c:490]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - as_contact: [](0) - bs_contact: [](0) Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [tps_storage.c:126]: tps_storage_lock_get(): tps lock get: 220 Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [tps_msg.c:1068]: tps_response_sent(): loaded branch a_uuid [atpsh-5eeb547f-3970-3] Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [tps_storage.c:138]: tps_storage_lock_release(): tps lock release: 220 Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [tps_msg.c:182]: tps_add_headers(): adding to headers(0) - [Contact: <sip:atpsh-5eeb547f-3970-3@127.0.0.1>#015#012] Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [tps_msg.c:1101]: tps_response_sent(): x_rr[] y_rr[] s_rr[<sip:127.0.0.1:5064;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=5A412B38-5EEB5492000D683F-C3258700;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:127.0.0.1:5064>,<sip:127.0.0.1;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=5A412B38-5EEB5492000D683F-C3258700;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:127.0.0.1:5064>] Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [tps_storage.c:391]: tps_storage_link_msg(): downstream: yes - acontact: [] - bcontact: [sip:127.0.2.1:50603;transport=UDP] Jun 18 13:48:35 sp1 lb[14702]: DEBUG: <null> topos [topos_mod.c:454]: tps_msg_sent(): new outbound buffer generated
topos [tps_msg.c:910]: tps_response_received(): x_rr[] y_rr[] s_rr[<sip:127.0.0.1:5064;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=5A412B38-5EEB5492000D683F-C3258700;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:127.0.0.1:5064>,<sip:127.0.0.1;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=5A412B38-5EEB5492000D683F-C3258700;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:127.0.0.1:5064>]
proper Record-Route value is on s_rr
s_rr
but here uses x_rr that is empty in this case
x_rr
pcap files for the same scenario with and without topos
no_topos.zip topos.zip
kamailio -v
This is Sipwise version based on 5.3.4, no patches on topos apart of the debug one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Uhm, maybe I'm missing something here. Sorry for the noise.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Description
Seems that topos is not adding Record-Route headers in this scenario.
Troubleshooting
Reproduction
Log Messages
I've added some more debug to topos: https://paste.debian.net/1152674/
Full kamailio-lb.log
This is the part when processing of the 200 OK coming from PSTN(fake)
proper Record-Route value is on
s_rr
but here uses
x_rr
that is empty in this caseSIP Traffic
pcap files for the same scenario with and without topos
no_topos.zip
topos.zip
Additional Information
kamailio -v
This is Sipwise version based on 5.3.4, no patches on topos apart of the debug one.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: