New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Solving a case with multiple timeslice definitions selected #29
Comments
Alternatively, one could use the scenario order to overwrite one definition with another and attempt to solve the model anyway... |
I won't be comfortable making all the assumptions needed to have a successful run in this case, but we can certainly issue a clear message. Thanks for testing this case. |
Thanks for taking a look at it @deepakgupta256. I do not get the error message; also in my case it says "Completed" instead of "Completed with error". I use localhost version 3.0.2. I am able to reproduce the behaviour (i.e. no error message and "Completed" instead of "Completed with error") on this model by adding |
The message was inadvertently suppressed in some cases. The non-fatal error thrown due to missing TS def in SysSettings has also been addressed in version 3.0.3. |
When a attempting to solve a case with multiple timeslice definitions selected (by accident), I've observed the following behaviour from Veda:
I think it is reasonable, that the no attempt is made to solve the model when multiple timeslice definitions are selected in a scenario group. It would be very helpful to warn the user about it though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: