Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better reporting of skipped specs #10

Open
4 tasks
vojtajina opened this issue Aug 16, 2013 · 2 comments
Open
4 tasks

Better reporting of skipped specs #10

vojtajina opened this issue Aug 16, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@vojtajina
Copy link
Contributor

A typical workflow is to run only a subset of specs (using iit/ddescribe with Jasmine).

Current output is not what we want:
webstorm-iit

  • remove the "Test skipped" log msg in the right
  • the overal count should display "1 of 1709" (it can also show "1708 skipped" - that's what karma reporter does)
  • the tree view (on the left) should auto expand the specs that were actually run (currently it's useless, as I have to click through and find the one that I executed).
  • the icon for skipped spec/suite (in the tree view on the left) is lame ;-), how about something gray ?

Maybe we could offer "hide skipped" (in the same way there's "hide passed").

@segrey
Copy link
Contributor

segrey commented Aug 27, 2013

Maybe we could offer "hide skipped" (in the same way there's "hide passed").

Check "Hide Ignored". WebStorm EAP 130.1630 handles this setting wrongly, but the next WebStorm EAP will bring correct behavior (see the screenshot).

settings-hide-ignored-tests

@segrey
Copy link
Contributor

segrey commented Aug 27, 2013

There is the following problem with "Test ignored." messages:
When a test suite tree node selected, the console contains:

Test ignored.
Test ignored.
Test ignored.
...

I'm thinking about merging all these messages into a single message, like "239 tests ignored".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants