Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Introduce type classes for representing terminals and non-terminals #13

Open
kawu opened this issue Jun 20, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Introduce type classes for representing terminals and non-terminals #13

kawu opened this issue Jun 20, 2016 · 0 comments
Assignees
@kawu
Labels
enhancement proposition

Comments

@kawu
Copy link
Owner

kawu commented Jun 20, 2016

The advantages would be:

  • In case some new requirements over terminal/non-terminal types arise, it would be sufficient to add them at the level of the respective classes. A notable example is the Show instance requirement, which is right now added (conditionally, using the preprocessor) for each function separately...
  • They would serve to annotate type parameters of the individual functions.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@kawu kawu

Labels
enhancement proposition
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kawu