| Date: | 2011-02-14 22:55 |
|---|---|
| Author: | Adam (adam.g.ginsburg@gmail.com) |
| tags: | http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008/kind#comment |
| slug: | it-looks-like-for-afgl-4029-combined-images-ds1 |
It looks like, for AFGL 4029 combined images, ds1 and ds5 agree to within 5% in the Dec2010 data. This implies that the offset is a result of the individual scans instead of coadds, though for the individual observations ds1>ds5 pretty uniformly.