New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some CS229 projects using Keras #1432
Comments
Nice stuff! My guess would be more of them would properly cite Keras if there was a canonical paper, instead of 'just' a github repo to cite? |
@fchollet Great. |
Cool stuff! |
It's possible, but I don't really believe it because users of Theano (and Torch, TensorFlow) tend not to cite their tools even though there are papers to cite. There is just no culture of crediting open-source projects in academia. |
We should not be worried about people not citing us. But I think its time for Keras to be more than a github repo. I am talking about Youtube channels, Tutorials, Blogs, Developer communities, Meetups, Workshops etc (the Mozilla of deep learning). |
👍 for @farizrahman4u suggestion. What about a simple mardown file including directives to cite Keras with a BibTeX entry like this? |
I suggest add an cite example(BibTex) in the ReadMe.md file. |
Here is the suggested BibTeX for scipy:
|
@fchollet I acutally just submitted a paper citing Keras (I do think it'd be helpful to have a standard paper or at least preferred citation format - maybe using zenodo?) |
@brettbj Link to your paper? |
@farizrahman4u it's a conference submission that doesn't allow preprints. Will post if it gets in! |
Cool! |
CS229 is the Stanford machine learning class, taught by Andrew Ng. This year a number of student projects were implemented using Keras. I thought it would be interesting for the Keras community to check them out:
navigation of Stanford campus
There may be more projects that I'm missing, either because they weren't indexed by Google or because they didn't cite Keras (100% of students use one or several open-source packages to implement their projects, but few of them actually cite their tools, probably only around 10% do). For comparison, I could find 1 (one) project using Torch, 4 (four) using TensorFlow and 3 (three) using Caffe.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: