Better selection step

[kermitt2]

Currently (it's an early version!), we simply use the first best result of the search step as camdidate for a matching. Obviously, we should consider the top n best candidate, and select the best one based on the parsed metadata (these parsed metadata can come as additional arguments of the query, see #12 or after a parsing of the reference string with GROBID citation model).

The matching service would then look much more like a traditional record matching service with a blocking step (search-based) and a fine-grained matching step where metadata are considered to select the best candidate in the block.

[kermitt2]

Example:

• Pnueli L, Carmel-Goren L, Hareven D, Gutfinger T,Alvarez J, Ganal M, Zamir D, Lifschitz E. Development.1998;125(11):1979–1989.

http://localhost:8080/service/lookup?biblio=Pnueli%20L,%20Carmel-Goren%20L,%20Hareven%20D,%20Gutfinger%20T,Alvarez%20J,%20Ganal%20M,%20Zamir%20D,%20Lifschitz%20E.%20Development.1998%3B125(11)%3A1979%E2%80%931989.&firstAuthor=Pnueli
-> no result
(wrong selection 10.1007/bf00022524)

good selection ->
10.1242/dev.125.11.1979
https://api.crossref.org/v1/works/10.1242/dev.125.11.1979

but not in the index?

[kermitt2]

Example:

• Adachi, A., Gendelman, H.E., Koenig, S., Folks, T., Willey, R., Rabson, A., andMartin, M.A. (1986). Production of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-associated retrovirus in human and nonhuman cells transfected with an infec-tious molecular clone. J. Virol.59, 284–291.

http://localhost:8080/service/lookup?biblio=Adachi,%20A.,%20Gendelman,%20H.E.,%20Koenig,%20S.,%20Folks,%20T.,%20Willey,%20R.,%20Rabson,%20A.,%20andMartin,%20M.A.%20(1986).%20Production%20of%20acquired%20immunodeficiency%20syndrome-associated%20retrovirus%20in%20human%20and%20nonhuman%20cells%20transfected%20with%20an%20infec-tious%20molecular%20clone.%20J.%20Virol.59,%20284%E2%80%93291.&postValidate=false
-> no result
(wrong selection 10.1073/pnas.82.13.4539)

[kermitt2]

Implemented with PR #62 but we still use only article title and first author for the pairwise ranking for the moment :)

[kermitt2]

Second example works fine with new version, selection and matching provide the right entry.

But the DOI of the first example, for some reasons, is not present in the latest index and can't be selected. To be investigated :/

[kermitt2]

Both examples are working fine now with version 0.2.