Visual overview of connections FNML

[samiscoding]

I think we need to generalize the Figure 1 Visual overview of connections FNML to also cover the reference to functions as subject and probably predicate, right?

[dachafra]

This is an interesting issue also for @anaigmo

[samiscoding]

in fact, I see that the diagram in #8 in generalized so I guess we are just missing in this visualization.

[dachafra]

Shall we close this issue then? @samiscoding

[samiscoding]

@bjdmeest what do you think about this modification in the figure?

[bjdmeest]

I kept capitalization in line with the (R2)RML specs, but no problem changing it. So maybe you could make the change or just add a note to remember to keep them in line with the final spec for now?

[pmaria]

@samiscoding I don't get the replacement of function-valued term map with Output Term Map, and return with output . I don't think that's in line with the current draft.

[bjdmeest]

@samiscoding I don't get the replacement of function-valued term map with Output Term Map, and return with output . I don't think that's in line with the current draft.

Ah, good catch, I glossed over that! Yeah that part of the change is not in line with what was last agreed, namely to define it similar to constant-valued term map, template-valued term map, etc

[samiscoding]

my bad! uploaded an old version of the figure. This is what I pushed to the repository

[bjdmeest]

Perfect! Closing this as it's added in the spec (and Ana's diagram too :) )