Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question about the dynamic threshold #20

Closed
jlro001 opened this issue May 22, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

question about the dynamic threshold #20

jlro001 opened this issue May 22, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@jlro001
Copy link

jlro001 commented May 22, 2019

How did you come up with the calculating of the dynamic threshold?
Is it enlightened by other works?
Can you please kindly explain it?

@vc1492a
Copy link

vc1492a commented May 22, 2019

@jlro001 thanks for the comment. You can find more information on how the dynamic threshold is set (briefly) in the video and (in detail) within the publication posted on the KDD website.

@khundman
Copy link
Owner

@jlro001 It was motivated by the fact that the residuals were non-Gaussian and a nonparametric approach allows for better generalization to other domains and datasets (with some tuning). Without too much overhead, all data points are scored in relation to the other data points, rather than relying on a distribution that doesn't fit the data to score each point. I haven't seen the approach in other works.

@jlro001
Copy link
Author

jlro001 commented May 25, 2019

Firstly, thank u for responding.
Actually, my question is how you come up with the complex formula to determine the number of standard deviations above μ.
Are there some works related to this?
Thank u!

@khundman
Copy link
Owner

None that I'm aware of. I created it to try and balance the empirical issues I was seeing (as described in the paper).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants