Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to FontAwesome 5 #179

Closed
2 tasks done
kevinpapst opened this issue Jun 24, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Upgrade to FontAwesome 5 #179

kevinpapst opened this issue Jun 24, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@kevinpapst
Copy link
Member

kevinpapst commented Jun 24, 2018

@kevinpapst kevinpapst added this to the 0.3 milestone Jun 24, 2018
@simonschaufi
Copy link
Contributor

simonschaufi commented Jun 24, 2018

Do you want to use the svg approach or the font file? SVG is recommended but a bit more difficult to maintain.

@kevinpapst
Copy link
Member Author

Haven't read enough about the options. I'd prefer the "easier" and more compatible way.
Any recommendation? Pros and Cons?

@simonschaufi
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like they have changed lots of things on their website. I use this way on one project and you have to specify all icons individually that you want to use.

Concerning performance: https://fontawesome.com/how-to-use/on-the-web/other-topics/performance

@kevinpapst
Copy link
Member Author

kevinpapst commented Jun 25, 2018

I am using the "classical" webfont approach for now, that was the easiest to implement

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Nov 18, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 18, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants