Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WorkshopParent Quest needs resynced with UF4OP #121

Closed
Diskmaster opened this issue Aug 13, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

WorkshopParent Quest needs resynced with UF4OP #121

Diskmaster opened this issue Aug 13, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@Diskmaster
Copy link

Provisioners, Pack Brahmin, and Caravan Guards were retaining their names after reassignment due to a missing "Clears Name When Removed" flag on the aliases in the Workshop Parent quest. (Bug #19653)

Trying to figure out why the WorkshopEnemyFaction was also altered.

@Diskmaster
Copy link
Author

As per recent discussion in xEdit's discord, the newly added property is in reference to AFK 27621 and should also be present.

WorkshopParentScript: The happiness malus applied to settlements as a penalty for the player killing a protected settler did also apply to synth infiltrators killed during a synth attack although they had their protected flags removed by the synth attack quest scripts (Bug #27621).

@Diskmaster Diskmaster changed the title UF4OP Forward: AFK Tracker 19653 WorkshopParent Quest needs resynced with UF4OP Aug 15, 2022
@msalaba01
Copy link

msalaba01 commented Aug 21, 2022

[08/18/2022 - 06:37:51PM] warning: Property IgnoreAccuracyBonusInUI on script workshopparentscript attached to WorkshopParent (0002058E) cannot be initialized because the script no longer contains that property

WorkshopParent override in WSFW esm needs to be removed. This will allow UFO4P to correctly override WorkshopParent.
WSFW

@Diskmaster
Copy link
Author

That's what kinggath had mentioned in the discord, but I never got around to updating the bug.

@Diskmaster
Copy link
Author

Fixed in 2.2.4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants