Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify the License #27

Closed
pksadiq opened this issue Oct 13, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Clarify the License #27

pksadiq opened this issue Oct 13, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@pksadiq
Copy link

pksadiq commented Oct 13, 2017

I hope that the code is public domain. It would be nice if this is explicitly stated in README.

@KittyGiraudel
Copy link
Owner

Fixed with a11ae8e. Sorry about this.

@pksadiq
Copy link
Author

pksadiq commented Oct 13, 2017

heh, sorry to say that I was excepting a public domain license. But it's your code. You have your choice.

So is it okay to use https://sass-guidelin.es/#architecture details as public domain? I'm creating a simple theme that shall be into public domain (CC0), so I can't use non public domain resources

@KittyGiraudel
Copy link
Owner

Regarding your link, this is not directly linked to this repository. This is part of Sass Guidelines which states:

The code for this project is licensed under MIT. The content for this project is licensed by Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

Given this repository is related to Sass Guidelines, it makes sense both share the same license when it comes to code.

Most of my code is licensed under MIT, which is a common and permissive license for open-source. Isn’t it enough for what you are trying to achieve?

@pksadiq
Copy link
Author

pksadiq commented Oct 13, 2017

Most of my code is licensed under MIT, which is a common and permissive license for open-source. Isn’t it enough for what you are trying to achieve?

Probably. I'll just keep the directory structure and write my own code to be safe.

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants