Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

better handling of missing workflow inputs #34

Open
zackgalbreath opened this issue Sep 19, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

better handling of missing workflow inputs #34

zackgalbreath opened this issue Sep 19, 2014 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@zackgalbreath
Copy link
Contributor

Currently if your workflow is missing an input connection it just says "undefined" when you attempt to run it. We should probably check that the entire workflow pipeline is properly connected when the user attempts to save it.

@zackgalbreath
Copy link
Contributor Author

A related issue exists for analysis outputs. Suppose you have a typo in your script and your output variable is named "tabel" instead of "table". The analysis will run to completion and then tangelo-hub will respond with "KeyError: table". We need to improve our error handling in cases such as these to more accurately point our users towards what they did wrong.

@jeffbaumes
Copy link
Member

Great idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants