Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

activation boxes #313

Closed
ciekawy opened this issue Mar 6, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

activation boxes #313

ciekawy opened this issue Mar 6, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels
Type: Enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ciekawy
Copy link
Contributor

ciekawy commented Mar 6, 2016

to represent that processes are being performed in response to the message (ExecutionSpecifications in UML)

@knsv knsv added the Type: Enhancement New feature or request label Mar 7, 2016
@knsv
Copy link
Collaborator

knsv commented Mar 7, 2016

Thanks for your input. It is a good idea!

Right now I am quite busy in another project so I will not have much time for this in the near future though. I will however support anyone trying to implement this.

@ciekawy
Copy link
Contributor Author

ciekawy commented Mar 8, 2016

here is my idea as for implementing this. I'd appreciate any suggestions.
ciekawy#1

@knsv
Copy link
Collaborator

knsv commented Mar 10, 2016

It looks good. You have understood the structure and put everything in the right place.

As for the remaining rendering work remember to keep track of the bounds and the vertical position so that things don't start to appear above one another. Another pointer is to make use of the tests for the calculations in the work, much better then writing the tests after when everything works :)

Good luck, looking for to the pull request.

@ciekawy
Copy link
Contributor Author

ciekawy commented Mar 11, 2016

Actually this is already working version
ciekawy#1

It includes also activation stacking - additional sub-activations for shorter periods. Waiting for comments ;)

I would like to add one more thing - a text arrow shortcuts for (de)activations. I.e using +/- character suffix for text arrorws like in https://www.websequencediagrams.com/

@ciekawy ciekawy mentioned this issue Mar 12, 2016
@ciekawy
Copy link
Contributor Author

ciekawy commented Mar 14, 2016

Thanks for the support! If there is no other issues #318 should be enough for this task.

@knsv
Copy link
Collaborator

knsv commented May 29, 2016

This is now part of realease 6.0.0. Thx!

@knsv knsv closed this as completed May 29, 2016
mgenereu pushed a commit to mgenereu/mermaid that referenced this issue Jun 25, 2022
…yarn/develop/autoprefixer-10.3.3

chore(deps-dev): bump autoprefixer from 10.3.1 to 10.3.3
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants