Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upweighting a training point vs Perturbing a training input #18

Closed
HanGuo97 opened this issue Jun 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Upweighting a training point vs Perturbing a training input #18

HanGuo97 opened this issue Jun 13, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@HanGuo97
Copy link

Hi, thanks again for this amazing work. I'm not sure this is the right place to ask this question, but I'm curious about the differences between these two approaches. Specifically, when should we use one approach vs. the other? Thanks in advance for the help!

@kohpangwei
Copy link
Owner

Hi Han,

Sorry for the late reply. These two approaches answer different questions: the first is when you want to see which training points are influential (i.e., what would happen if you removed them?) and the second is when you want to see how the model would respond if the training points were slightly different (e.g., if you were interested in what would happen if there was additive noise).

@HanGuo97
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the explanation!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants