Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge entries while pasting #85

Open
koppor opened this issue Dec 5, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Merge entries while pasting #85

koppor opened this issue Dec 5, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@koppor
Copy link
Owner

koppor commented Dec 5, 2015

Context: https://www.uni-bamberg.de/fileadmin/uni/fakultaeten/wiai_lehrstuehle/praktische_informatik/Dateien/Publikationen/BibTex/seke08BibEintrag.txt

@inproceedings{seke08Schoenberger,
  author    = {Andreas Sch\"onberger and Guido Wirtz},
  title     = {Taxonomy on Consistency Requirements in the Business Process Integration Context},
  booktitle = {SEKE},
  year      = {2008},
  crossref  = {seke08}
}

@proceedings{seke08,
  title     = {Proceedings of 2008 Conf. on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE'2008),
               Redwood City, California, USA, July 1-3, 2008},
  booktitle = {SEKE},
  publisher = {Knowledge Systems Institute}
}

When I paste an entry like this in JabRef, I want it to be merged into a single entry.

Even more improved version: lookup if a similar @proceedings exists and show merge entries dialog for that. Adapt crossref of @inproceedings accordingly.

@ilippert
Copy link

Oh, wow, thanks for pointing this out at JabRef#6294. I guess I would precisely not like the entries to be unified, but rather to automatically generate a crossref from seke08Schoenberger to seke08, because if I actually paste the seke08 entry, then I do that because more "subentries", croossreferencing seke08 are expected by me.

@koppor
Copy link
Owner Author

koppor commented Sep 26, 2023

Maybe, it should be configurable (per library - refs JabRef#8701).

Reason: As a master or PhD student, when "quickly" collecting references, one "just" harvests one or two references for a conference. As a senior researcher, one wants a real "proper" maintained collection.


JabRef smalltalk

Note, there was an "interesting" approach using variant-encoding in BibTeX: https://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/egs/crosstex/index.php. "Scientific" article. http://svn.tug.org/TUGboat/tb28-3/tb90burgess.pdf

I was once trying to have JabRef ported to that, but that lead to a completely new JabRef (https://github.com/JabRef/CrossRefX), which we did not follow up.

If you like the CrossTeX idea, maybe, it is worth to give it more thought.

(Link: dblp to crosstex converter: https://github.com/el33th4x0r/crosstex-dbgen)

@ilippert
Copy link


I respond in smalltalk ;)
wow, thanks for the CrossTeX pointer. Very interesting, indeed. However, in my specific position, no chance I engage with the CrossTeX coding community, which seems quite asleep, at least, looking at https://github.com/el33th4x0r/crosstex/.

@koppor
Copy link
Owner Author

koppor commented Sep 26, 2023

wow, thanks for the CrossTeX pointer. Very interesting, indeed. However, in my specific position, no chance I engage with the CrossTeX coding community, which seems quite asleep, at least, looking at https://github.com/el33th4x0r/crosstex/.

Sure! With "it", I meant: Integrating in JabRef, offering conversion to plain BibTeX in JabRef, ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants