Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some questions about the sub-sampled setting #2

Closed
ddghjikle opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Some questions about the sub-sampled setting #2

ddghjikle opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@ddghjikle
Copy link

Hi, thanks very much for sharing this wonderful work. According to experimental details in the paper, the sub-sampled setting is similar to the partial-set DA and open-set DA. Is that true? By the way, is there any possibility that codes related to the multi-source setting can also be released?

@korawat-tanwisuth
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for your interest in our work! The sub-sample setup is still a closed-set UDA setting. The categories between source and target remain the same. However, the proportions of classes are skewed (not uniform). The code provided can directly be used for the multi-source setting. You can use Concat dataset to combine the source data into one data loader.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants