Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Note: Implementation uses explicit requestAnimationFrame calls [sticky] #796

Open
krausest opened this issue Sep 26, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@krausest
Copy link
Owner

(Severity: Code smell / cheating)
There were some discussions whether using requestAnimationFrame in client code is okay, a code smell or cheating.
Applying RAF for selected benchmark operations should be avoided and is considered cheating:
#166
#430

Using RAF for all operations in client code should be okay (that doesn't answer the question whether is's nice) since frameworks are allowed to use RAF under the covers too.

@krausest krausest changed the title Note: Implementation uses explicit requestAnimationFrame calls Note: Implementation uses explicit requestAnimationFrame calls [sticky] May 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant