[Peer Review] Reproduction of results of manuscript

[cthoyt]

The main research output of this manuscript is obviously the code in this repository. However, to assess the veracity of the claims made in the paper about its goodness in comparison to previous libraries, the code for running the benchmarking experiments, organizing their respective results, and turning them into the figures that appear in the main manuscript and supplemental material should be made available (in a form that is readily useful). I'd go as far as to suggest putting it in a different repository entirely, to mitigate confusion and disorganization.

I appreciate that it's not easy to set up a barrage of different packages written in a variety of languages, and understand that it might take significant time and effort to prepare this code for the same scrutiny as the package itself. I hope you agree that it is necessary to assess the methodology used for benchmarking to give an accurate review.