Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Protocol v5 tests #96

Closed
krojew opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Protocol v5 tests #96

krojew opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@krojew
Copy link
Owner

krojew commented Jun 15, 2022

After introducing protocol v5, we need extensive end-to-end tests on a v5 cluster. Ideally, also regressions checks with v4.

Such tests include running all types of queries with and without compression (everything from section 4 of https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/doc/native_protocol_v5.spec), listening to events, using high-level Rust-to-UDT (de)serialization, using different authentication methods.

Note: use the latest Cassandra 4.0 and the master branch, since the changes are not published yet.

@krojew krojew added help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers labels Jun 15, 2022
@krojew
Copy link
Owner Author

krojew commented Jun 28, 2022

@conorbros have you had a chance to check out the latest master?

@conorbros
Copy link
Contributor

conorbros commented Jul 5, 2022

@krojew I intend on looking into it this week.

We have v4 running on the latest master but will look into getting v5 working soon.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 5, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Sep 5, 2022
@krojew krojew closed this as completed Sep 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants