New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
evaluate impact of including other contracts #20
Comments
examples can be found in the "Advent of Code" repository of Hans: |
more information about that topic here: |
as discussed we probably need to also consider the includes. at least we need to verify the impact regarding bytecode when using imports. it is also possible to define custom includes. example here: more about that here: |
@mitch-lbw I think we should check this one here before the release. I would like to make sure we do not miss anything here before releasing v1.0.0 |
as discussed we don't expect any problems by using built-in imports. currently it isn't possible to compile contracts that use custom imports (which are referenced on the filesystem). for the compiler it is possible to provide the attributes maybe we should skip that for now and make a release |
further discussion here: |
Discussion on deployment of contracts with includes |
works now |
we need to consider that it is possible to include built-in contracts like
List.aes
. we need to verify the impact to our generated classes and add support for this if necessary.the contracts can e.g. contain:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: