Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How do we correct misunderstandings/lack of knowledge? #12

Closed
elimisteve opened this issue Dec 12, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

How do we correct misunderstandings/lack of knowledge? #12

elimisteve opened this issue Dec 12, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@elimisteve
Copy link

You're writing some code. And suddenly you understand you need something that language can't give you. You go here and check if you're the one with that issue or not. If it's a common issue, it'll be here. Then you decide what to do: choose another tool for your task or go find a better solution or a workaround.

What if it's common to do something in Go incorrectly, and that's what people are complaining about? This would be a great venue to teach people the better way, perhaps by adding links or comments just after certain complaints. Will you accept PRs that help clarify such issues? Thanks.

@thedrow
Copy link

thedrow commented Dec 12, 2015

That will help new Go programmers like me understand how to resolve issues better.

@ksimka
Copy link
Owner

ksimka commented Dec 15, 2015

@elimisteve I think it's simply impossible, it'll end up with another holy war. We all have our own opinions. One will always complain about a thing another wouldn't even think of. Every problem is unique and can be solved in many ways. "To do something incorrectly" — corectness is a soooo relative term. I.e. I don't agree with some arguments listed here, but authors think they're 100% right, and they have a right to think so :)

@ksimka ksimka closed this as completed Dec 15, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants