Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

is bitpocket still maintained ? #43

Closed
jpcaruana opened this issue Oct 25, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed

is bitpocket still maintained ? #43

jpcaruana opened this issue Oct 25, 2013 · 5 comments

Comments

@jpcaruana
Copy link

Hi,
is bitpocket still maintained ? If not, is there any official fork ?
It's a nice tool

thanks

@torfason
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm one of the maintainers of bitpocket (the other one is sickill, who is the original author).

I would say that bitpocket is still maintained, even though the maintenance is not very active. As far as I see it, maintenance of bitpocket is mostly limited to fixing data-loss bugs and merging pull requests. It is also, of course, limited by the time of the maintainers.

That said, I do know that there are several open pull requests that have not been merged. From my perspective, the most important issue is avoiding data loss at all costs, so I'll want to take a pretty good look at any pull requests before including them. Each comment from current users does increase the likelihood that I take the time to merge them, though :-)

I don't know of an official fork, and if there is someone out there who'd be willing to put in the time to be a more active maintainer than sickill and I are, I'm pretty sure sickill would be happy to grant them commit access to this repository instead of doing it as a fork. Given some proof of intent, of course. Not that I would speak for him, but he was very open to giving me access after I made some contributions.

@ku1ik
Copy link
Owner

ku1ik commented Oct 26, 2013

I can just repeat every single word that @torfason wrote :)

Also, bitpocket is quite complete feature-wise in my opinion. Of course, there are many things that are not included and would be beneficial for many users but I'm afraid that bitpocket reached a point where it's not possible to add any new major feature without dropping rsync as the core dependency and reimplementing rsync's functionality from scratch. It started as a thin, smart wrapper around rsync and it's highly tied to it.

Having said that I will repeat after @torfason that small improvements and bugfixes are always welcome. My time is limited recently so it may look like it's a bit unmaintained, true. But I really appreciate that @torfason engaged with the project, making great contribution to it.

@jpcaruana
Copy link
Author

ok thanks for your answers.

@ku1ik ku1ik reopened this Aug 2, 2016
@ku1ik
Copy link
Owner

ku1ik commented Aug 2, 2016

We have several open issues and PRs that need looking into. I don't really have time for this project anymore. What about you @torfason? Should we look for new maintainers?

@torfason
Copy link
Collaborator

torfason commented Aug 2, 2016

Unfortunately I'm in the same situation, these days I do not have time for any updates. Realistically, I won't manage any pull requests in the near or medium future. I'd second getting new maintainers if any are to be found ...

On the plus side, it's a very neat and simple to understand script (apart from a few sections where it needs to work around the quirks of the underlying commands), so a new maintainer could get up and running quickly.

@ku1ik ku1ik closed this as completed Aug 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants