Fetch GCP machine and disk types from API

[maciaszczykm]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged): Fixes #1322.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

GCP machine and disk types are now fetched from GCP.

[maciaszczykm]

@floreks Thanks, using private makes a lot of sense, sometimes I forgot to do it though :)

I will fix the tests now.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1363 into master will decrease coverage by 1.01%.
The diff coverage is 35.4%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1363      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.76%   73.75%   -1.02%     
==========================================
  Files         203      203              
  Lines        5961     6096     +135     
  Branches      538      562      +24     
==========================================
+ Hits         4457     4496      +39     
- Misses       1292     1373      +81     
- Partials      212      227      +15

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/app/shared/model/NodeProviderConstants.ts	91.66% <100%> (-0.93%)	⬇️
...node-data/gcp-node-data/gcp-node-data.component.ts	41.44% <33.33%> (-24.07%)	⬇️
src/app/core/services/api/api.service.ts	35.53% <33.33%> (-0.75%)	⬇️
src/app/core/services/wizard/provider/gcp.ts	51.51% <41.66%> (-34.2%)	⬇️
src/app/testing/services/api-mock.service.ts	72.04% <50%> (-1%)	⬇️
src/app/shared/entity/HealthEntity.ts	86.66% <0%> (-13.34%)	⬇️
src/app/member/member.component.ts	73.33% <0%> (-2.67%)	⬇️
...uster/cluster-details/cluster-details.component.ts	70.07% <0%> (-0.56%)	⬇️
...tails/cluster-secrets/cluster-secrets.component.ts	89.09% <0%> (-0.2%)	⬇️
src/app/testing/fake-data/health.fake.ts	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
... and 1 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 87cdc67...38439a3. Read the comment docs.

[maciaszczykm]

/test pull-dashboard-headless-test

[floreks]

/lgtm
/approve

[kubermatic-bot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 4cebe0f6f3708ab9006407e86e237af239e71867

[kubermatic-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: floreks

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [floreks]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[kdomanski]

@maciaszczykm Could this be cherry-picked into the v1.3 branch or does it also require the presets to be backported into Kubermatic v2.11?

[maciaszczykm]

@kdomanski It requires presets and 2 PRs to the backend (the second one was adding no-credentails endpoints).