Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update nginx-ingress-controller to 0.26.1 #4400

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 30, 2019
Merged

Conversation

xrstf
Copy link
Contributor

@xrstf xrstf commented Sep 29, 2019

What this PR does / why we need it:
This has a fix for the issue plaguing our offline cluster. It was a smooth update on dev.

This PR also adds the allowPrivilegeEscalation field to the security context, which was set since 0.22 by kubernetes/ingress-nginx#3342 but we never noticed because we don't have policies forbidding this behaviour by default.

The memory limit was increased because the release notes for 0.26 mentioned higher resource usage while connections are drained.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Update nginx-ingress-controller to 0.26.1

@xrstf xrstf requested a review from kron4eg September 29, 2019 16:49
@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Sep 29, 2019
@kubermatic-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: xrstf

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 29, 2019
config: {}
extraArgs:
- '--default-ssl-certificate=default/kubermatic-tls-certificates'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What’s the reason behind this move? It used to be a strictly defined integration point between ingress controller and certmanager and now it became a possible to be overwritten and forgotten configuration option.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@xrstf xrstf Sep 29, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It felt weird to read some Kubermatic identifier within the nginx template, and a good opportunity to add the extraArgs stuff. But I don't feel strongly about it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So.... keep it or remove it?

version: 1.0.2
appVersion: 0.25.1
version: 1.0.3
appVersion: 0.26.0
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bugfix 0.26.1 is available

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:trollface:

@xrstf xrstf changed the title Update nginx-ingress-controller to 0.26.0 Update nginx-ingress-controller to 0.26.1 Sep 30, 2019
Copy link
Member

@kron4eg kron4eg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 30, 2019
@kubermatic-bot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 4468468ce6c654a5fbe40990adf674466379728c

@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot merged commit 4d66f7d into master Sep 30, 2019
@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot added this to the v2.12 milestone Sep 30, 2019
@kubermatic-bot kubermatic-bot deleted the nginx-0.26.0 branch September 30, 2019 10:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants