-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update nginx-ingress-controller to 0.26.1 #4400
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: xrstf The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
config: {} | ||
extraArgs: | ||
- '--default-ssl-certificate=default/kubermatic-tls-certificates' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What’s the reason behind this move? It used to be a strictly defined integration point between ingress controller and certmanager and now it became a possible to be overwritten and forgotten configuration option.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It felt weird to read some Kubermatic identifier within the nginx template, and a good opportunity to add the extraArgs stuff. But I don't feel strongly about it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So.... keep it or remove it?
version: 1.0.2 | ||
appVersion: 0.25.1 | ||
version: 1.0.3 | ||
appVersion: 0.26.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bugfix 0.26.1 is available
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 4468468ce6c654a5fbe40990adf674466379728c
|
What this PR does / why we need it:
This has a fix for the issue plaguing our offline cluster. It was a smooth update on dev.
This PR also adds the
allowPrivilegeEscalation
field to the security context, which was set since 0.22 by kubernetes/ingress-nginx#3342 but we never noticed because we don't have policies forbidding this behaviour by default.The memory limit was increased because the release notes for 0.26 mentioned higher resource usage while connections are drained.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: