Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 21, 2020. It is now read-only.

Does NFS provisioner support resizing? #1142

Closed
fr0der1c opened this issue Mar 4, 2019 · 10 comments
Closed

Does NFS provisioner support resizing? #1142

fr0der1c opened this issue Mar 4, 2019 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/nfs lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@fr0der1c
Copy link

fr0der1c commented Mar 4, 2019

I use NFS provisioner to provision PersistentVolume for my MongoDB. Recently, I found the volume is going to out of space. So I searched and found https://kubernetes.io/blog/2018/07/12/resizing-persistent-volumes-using-kubernetes/. This requires underlying storage provider support. I'm wondering if NFS provisioner support this? If not, is there any possible way to adjust the size of the volume?

@wongma7
Copy link
Contributor

wongma7 commented Mar 4, 2019

no it does not, note quota i.e. the size of the volume is not enforced, you can request a 1 GiB volume but use more than 1 GiB. this is a limitation for nfs

@fr0der1c
Copy link
Author

fr0der1c commented Mar 4, 2019

OK. Thanks for your reply. Maybe this should be put into readme?

@wongma7
Copy link
Contributor

wongma7 commented Mar 4, 2019

yes, agree

@wongma7 wongma7 self-assigned this Mar 4, 2019
@limbuu
Copy link

limbuu commented Mar 14, 2019

@fr0der1c i had almost same issue. But, i used gce-pd for storage using nfs server. Now, the configured size of storage is totally consumed. Is there any way around to resize the storage or any way to fix the problem?

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 12, 2019
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 12, 2019
@fr0der1c
Copy link
Author

fr0der1c commented Aug 5, 2019

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fr0der1c: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ankitjain87
Copy link

ankitjain87 commented Apr 6, 2020

I was also looking for this, I just wanted to know if there is any update on this? If not, is there a plan to support this feature?

@ThomasSonck
Copy link

+1

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area/nfs lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants