Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Filter API endpoints via regexp #67

Closed
hh opened this issue Jan 20, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Filter API endpoints via regexp #67

hh opened this issue Jan 20, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
@zachmandeville
Projects
[0.19.1] Improved Scope Limiting / Sh...
Milestone
0.19.1

Comments

@hh
Copy link
Contributor

hh commented Jan 20, 2019

For untested API endpoints, we need to be able to filter without having any test tags or useragent data.
@hh hh created this issue from a note in Data Analysis of Helm Charts (Triage) Jan 20, 2019
@hh hh mentioned this issue Jan 20, 2019
Closed
@hh hh moved this from Triage to Backlog in Data Analysis of Helm Charts Jan 20, 2019
@hh hh moved this from Backlog to In progress in Data Analysis of Helm Charts Jan 27, 2019
@devaips devaips removed this from In progress in Data Analysis of Helm Charts Jan 27, 2019
@hh
Copy link
Contributor Author

hh commented Jan 27, 2019 •
edited
Loading

@spiffxp https://dev.apisnoop.cncf.ci/?filter=storage currently supports string searches.
@zachmandeville can you look at http://xregexp.com or the built in RexExp?

@devaips
Copy link

devaips commented Jan 28, 2019

Related to #75

@zachmandeville
Copy link
Contributor

We are now able to do this, but the filter feature is disabled by default as we think usable, valuable filtering requires a bit more strategy and thought than a simple text field We'll return to it after these discussions have happened.

[0.19.1] Improved Scope Limiting / Sharing automation moved this from In Progress to Done Jan 28, 2019
@hh hh added the 0.19.1 label Mar 6, 2019
@hh hh added this to the 0.19.1 milestone Mar 6, 2019
@mgdevstack mgdevstack mentioned this issue Mar 12, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@zachmandeville zachmandeville

Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
[0.19.1] Improved Scope Limiting / Sh...
  
Done
Milestone
0.19.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@hh @zachmandeville @devaips