Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Document Overlay Schemas #52

Open
alexzielenski opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #93
Open

Document Overlay Schemas #52

alexzielenski opened this issue May 31, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #93
Assignees
@swastik959
Labels
good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines.

Comments

@alexzielenski
Copy link
Contributor

Overlay schemas could be a very powerful tool for consumers to validate custom policies for their types. We should document how to use them for CRDs and native types
@alexzielenski alexzielenski added the good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines. label May 31, 2023
@swastik959
Copy link
Contributor

@alexzielenski can you please explain it a bit more

@alexzielenski
Copy link
Contributor Author

The tool has an option --overlay-schemas which will allow users to apply JSON patches onto the resource schemas before they are used for validation for custom behavior.

Would like for usage and examples to be documented in the README and usage in the tool help.

@swastik959
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

@swastik959 swastik959 linked a pull request Feb 23, 2024 that will close this issue
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@swastik959 swastik959

Labels
good first issue Denotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

added overlay-schema to readme.md swastik959/kubectl-validate
2 participants
@alexzielenski @swastik959