Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

patches cause an error with $patch:delete in files with multiple patches #5552

Open
gruzchik opened this issue Feb 23, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.

Comments

@gruzchik
Copy link

gruzchik commented Feb 23, 2024

What happened?

patchesStrategicMerge was used for include a code that declare $path:delete in patches for rewrite output from bases and granually including some structure per environment (after initial declaration in bases)

After Kustomize version was upgraded kustomize from 4.5.x to 5.3.0 and upgrading to patches from patchesStrategicMerge it cause an error in a files multiple patches with $patch:delete

What did you expect to happen?

Running the command "kustomize build ./overlay/test" shows resources that have not been disabled for overlays.

How can we reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible)?

Run this in terminal or with a bash file and check output with patches and patchesStrategicMerge

mkdir -p kustomize-test/base
mkdir -p kustomize-test/overlay/dev
mkdir -p kustomize-test/overlay/test

cat <<EOF> kustomize-test/base/kustomization.yaml
resources:
- workflow.yaml
EOF

cat <<EOF> kustomize-test/base/workflow.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: workflow-suffix1
spec:
  template:
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: worker
        image: worker:1.14.2
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: workflow-suffix2
spec:
  template:
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: worker
        image: worker:1.14.2
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: workflow-suffix3
spec:
  template:
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: worker
        image: worker:1.14.2
EOF

cat <<EOF> kustomize-test/overlay/test/workflow-patch.yaml
\$patch: delete
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: workflow-suffix1
---
\$patch: delete
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: workflow-suffix2
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: workflow-suffix3
EOF

cat <<EOF> kustomize-test/overlay/test/kustomization.yaml
resources:
  - ../../base

patches: # instead of patchesStrategicMerge
  - path: workflow-patch.yaml

# patchesStrategicMerge:
#   - workflow-patch.yaml
EOF

kustomize build kustomize-test/overlay/test

Expected output

a proper output with workflow-suffix3 deployment declaration

Actual output

panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x40 pc=0x9902cb]

goroutine 1 [running]:
sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/yaml.(*RNode).Content(...)
sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/yaml/rnode.go:707
sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/yaml.(*RNode).getMapFieldValue(0x14002260b08?, {0x10476bfb1?, 0x7?})
sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/yaml/rnode.go:420 +0x54
sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/yaml.(*RNode).GetApiVersion(...)
sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/yaml/rnode.go:402
sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/resid.GvkFromNode(0x140017648b8?)
sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/kyaml/resid/gvk.go:32 +0x40
sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resource.(*Resource).GetGvk(...)
sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resource/resource.go:57
sigs.k8s.io/kustomize/api/resource.(*Resource).CurId(0x1400044e960)

Kustomize version

kustomize 5.3.0

Operating system

Linux

@gruzchik gruzchik added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Feb 23, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label Feb 23, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

SIG CLI takes a lead on issue triage for this repo, but any Kubernetes member can accept issues by applying the triage/accepted label.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ginokok1996
Copy link

Experiencing the same issues..
Anything you were able to do to fix this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants