-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: update helm document to match values.yaml #727
docs: update helm document to match values.yaml #727
Conversation
Hi @kaitoii11. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Welcome @kaitoii11! |
@@ -300,12 +300,13 @@ We have introduced the following Chart parameters. | |||
| `master.featureRulesController` | bool | null | Specifies whether the controller for processing of NodeFeatureRule objects is enabled. If not set, controller will be enabled if `master.instance` is empty. | |||
| `master.replicaCount` | integer | 1 | Number of desired pods. This is a pointer to distinguish between explicit zero and not specified | | |||
| `master.podSecurityContext` | dict | {} | SecurityContext holds pod-level security attributes and common container settings | | |||
| `master.securityContext` | dict | {} | Container [security settings](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/security-context/#set-the-security-context-for-a-pod)| |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: The link refers to Pod security context. Could you point into container security, context instead?
Related suggestion: you could update master.podSecurityContext
above similarly (to have a link) 😊
/ok-to-test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @kaitoii11, looks good now
/retest
/label tide/merge-method-squash
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kaitoii11, marquiz The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherrypick release-0.10 |
@marquiz: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-0.10 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm |
@marquiz: new pull request created: #756 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Update helm chart parameters.